Home Superstorm Sandy Local Towns Opposing Change That Would Require More Residents to Build on...

Local Towns Opposing Change That Would Require More Residents to Build on Pilings

2
SHARE

A house being raised following Superstorm Sandy damage. (Photo: Daniel Nee)
A house being raised following Superstorm Sandy damage. (Photo: Daniel Nee)

Brick and Toms River have joined several local communities in formally opposing a change in the state’s Uniform Construction Code that will require residents whose homes are located in the “Coastal A” flood zone to build to “V” zone standards, which could significantly increase the cost of flood insurance, house raisings and could even drive some to abandon their homes, officials fear.

The decision by the state Department of Community Affairs, which goes into effect March 19, would affect about 1,000 homes in Brick, officials said, and between 1,000 and 2,000 in Toms River – mainly homes in bayfront neighborhoods. Those residents in the Coastal A zone would be required under state codes to build or lift their homes onto piling foundations to comply rather than simply meeting height requirements on a standard block foundation. So-called “V” zones are named as such because they are areas in which structures may experience wave velocity, but local officials say no such threat is present.

The requirements call for structures to be able to withstand moving water and breaking waves 1.5 to 3 feet deep.

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW


“Now there are people who are planning to raise their house on block who are going to have the added cost of moving their homes and putting it up on pilings,” said Brick Mayor John Ducey.

“It’s a terrible thing,” Ducey continued. “We had a conference with the DCA and they seemed to say it’s not that big of a deal. Some people are going to walk away from their houses.”

Ducey also said that, to make matters worse, residents who have already rebuilt and raised their homes following Superstorm Sandy could be subject to massive flood insurance increases for not complying with the new codes – even though they were not in effect when the elevations were completed.

In the past week, both the Brick and Toms River township councils have passed resolutions calling on the DCA to rescind the rule change.

“In some cases, it’s going to be less expensive to demolish the home rather than the rebuild the existing homes,” said Toms River Council President George Wittmann. “You’re going to have people who have lived in the community for a long time having to sell their properties because they’re not going to be able to afford to raise their homes.”

“The maps were amended and we were relieved to see a lot of the properties that were in V zones were taken out of V zones, and now it looks like we’re going backwards,” said Toms River Councilman Jeffrey Carr.

DCA officials say they believe elevating on pilings can, in some cases, be cheaper than elevating on a block foundation, but local officials and engineers largely disagree, especially since raising a house onto pilings often require physically moving the structure for a period of time.

Residents who are unsure of their flood zone can look it up using a FEMA web tool.

SHARE
  • Maria Ferguson

    Thanks to the Mayors for attempting to get this rescinded. My Brick neighborhood is still very much devastated from Sandy with about 30% of the homes not yet repaired or in process of repair/replace. Home values have dropped significantly and those trying to sell are not selling. Taxes are based on preSandy values which are no longer relevant and inappropriate due to what has occurred in our neighborhood. Most of those that have raised to date are NOT on pilings. To hit these homeowners with another requirement will cause more abandonment in our already devastated neighborhood, with many seemingly abandoned homes bringing down the value of the rest. Help!

    • Ortley guy

      Maria,
      If your tax assessments are truly based on pre-Sandy values then you should appeal your assessment before the April 1st deadline. There are lots of attorneys who do this and they do it on contingency, they typically get paid the reduction in the assessment for the 1st year – and some only take a percentage of that depending on how large the reduction is.